173 results for 'court:"Court of Federal Claims"'.
J. Dietz declines to dismiss claims in which servicemen and servicewomen contend they suffered adverse personnel actions due to the Covid-19 vaccine mandate because service members sufficiently pleaded entitlement to backpay since the mandate was unlawful in light of the lack of FDA licensing for the vaccine.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Dietz, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 23-211, Categories: Covid-19, Military
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Davis finds for the U.S. in this post-award bid protest concerning a contract to provide administrative support to FEMA because the agency's conclusions supported its determination.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Davis, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 23-2194, Categories: Contract
J. Bonilla finds for the U.S. in claims seeking relief following plaintiff's discharge from the Coast Guard for misconduct because the decision to deny plaintiff under the second chance program was reasonably justified. Affirmed.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Bonilla, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 22-1689C, Categories: Veterans
J. Bruggink grants the U.S. dismissal of pro se patent infringement claims related to cellular phones because the claim is identical to multiple other claims that have already been considered and dismissed.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Bruggink, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 23-811C, Categories: Patent
J. Smith grants a buyer leave to amend breach of contract claims concerning the sale of real property because the buyer sufficiently claimed that the original contract was breached when the U.S. changed the closing date.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 23-1182, Categories: Property, Contract
J. Smith finds for the U.S. in this pre-award protest concerning a contract to provide spiritual services for the life connections program facilitator at the federal correctional institution located in Milan, Michigan, because the U.S. adequately described its procedures for screening employees.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 23-322, Categories: Contract
J. Davis finds for the U.S. in claims challenging the finding that the general services administration overpaid a company for real estate tax increases for six years because the company failed to establish grounds to sue for damages related to the overpayment.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Davis, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 20-116C, Categories: Tax, Contract
[Consolidated.] J. Davis finds for the U.S. in this post-award bid protest in which the VA sought a health care clearinghouse contractor to provide services to the office of integrated care because evidence indicated the decision had been reasonable.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Davis, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 23-581C, Categories: Contract
J. Tapp grants the U.S. dismissal of this post-award bid protest for a contract to provide information technology services because evidence indicates the proposals underwent reasonable review.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Tapp, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 23-1756, Categories: Contract
J. Lerner finds that the U.S. should be granted dismissal of breach of contract claims contending a private security company had not been paid for services provided in Afghanistan because the U.S. had not entered a contract with the company.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Lerner, Filed On: April 2, 2024, Case #: 22-1313C, Categories: Contract
J. Hertling finds that defendant should be granted summary judgment in claims brought under the Contract Disputes Act following cancellation of a task order to provide engineering and program management support services to the department of the navy because failed to implement a 20-person team as required under the contract.
J. Hertling finds in favor of the government in this dispute over a canceled contract for the provision of engineering services to the Navy. The cancellation for default was justified due to the company's failure to provide the proper sized team to carry out the task.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Hertling, Filed On: March 29, 2024, Case #: 23-1029, Categories: Contract
J. Meyers declines to dismiss claims contending the Air Force took a company's equipment without providing compensation because the company sufficiently pleaded that the Air Force failed to pay the company after taking the property through its contractor.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Meyers, Filed On: March 21, 2024, Case #: 23-6L, Categories: Property, Contract